Q-I-ST Framework

Questions, Ideas, Supplementary Tools

When processing notes into atomic form, categorize each into one of three types. Each type becomes its own note.

The Three Types

Type	What It Is	Tag Suggestion	Example
Questions	What the idea answers	#question	”Why does early specialization hurt long-term performance?”
Ideas	Core concepts, claims, insights	#idea, #paradox, #counter-intuitive	”Sampling period enables later specialization”
Supplementary Tools	Evidence supporting ideas	#quote, #anecdote, #study	Study: “Nobel scientists 22x more likely to have artistic hobbies”

Why Separate Them?

Flexibility. A single study can support multiple ideas. A question can have multiple answers from different domains. Keeping them atomic lets you recombine freely.

Retrieval. When writing, you need different things at different times:

• Starting an essay? Search #question for angles
• Need authority? Search #study for evidence
• Want to open with a hook? Search #anecdote

The Relationship

Question
    └── answered by → Idea
                        └── supported by → Supplementary Tool

Questions organize your thinking. Ideas are your processed understanding. Supplementary Tools give weight and evidence to ideas.

Processing Example

Source: Chapter from Range by David Epstein on sampling period.

Break down into:

1. Question note: “Why does early specialization hurt long-term performance?”

   • Tags: #question, #build
   • Links to: relevant idea notes

2. Idea note: “Sampling period enables later specialization”

   • Tags: #idea, #counter-intuitive
   • Links to: question it answers, supporting evidence

3. Supplementary notes:

   • “Tiger Woods vs Roger Federer comparison” (#anecdote)
   • “Study on early vs late specializers in sports” (#study)
   • Each links to the idea it supports

Relationship to Q/E/C Method

Cal Newport’s Q/E/C (Question, Evidence, Conclusion) is similar:

Q/E/C	Q-I-ST
Question	Question
Evidence	Supplementary Tools
Conclusion	Idea

Same underlying structure. Q-I-ST emphasizes making each component its own atomic note.

---

Common Trap

Keeping them bundled. If you write “Sampling period (from Range, Ch 3, Roger Federer example)” as one note, you can’t reuse the Federer anecdote elsewhere. Separate them.

---

North: Where does this comes from?

• Atomic Notes (the atomicity principle)
• Q-E-C Method (Cal Newport’s framework)

East: What opposes this?

• Bundled Notes (all information in one long note)
• Source-Based Organization (organized by where it came from, not what it is)

South: Where this leads?

• Processing Notes for Retrieval (using tags to find these types)
• Writing From Notes (pulling Q, I, and ST together for output)

West: What is similar?

• Argument Mapping (claims supported by evidence)
• Legal Brief Structure (issue, rule, application, conclusion)