Core principle: One idea per note. Each note should be able to stand alone.

Why Atomic?

Giant DocumentAtomic Notes
Think vertically, chronologically (A → B → C)Think in 3D—up, down, diagonal
Remove A and C, you forget BEach idea stands alone
Ideas trapped in one contextIdeas become movable building blocks
Hard to recombineEasy to rearrange and connect

Charlie Munger: “The first rule is that you can’t really know anything if you just remember isolated facts and try and bang ‘em back. If the facts don’t hang together on a latticework of theory, you don’t have them in a usable form.”

Atomic notes create the building blocks. Links create the latticework.

Luhmann’s Rule

Each idea should fit on an index card. Small enough to be a single thought, complete enough to be understood without context.

Three Categories of Atomic Notes

When processing, break ideas into:

CategoryWhat It IsExample
QuestionsWhat the idea answers”Why do generalists outperform long-term?”
IdeasCore concepts”Sampling period enables later specialization”
Supplementary ToolsEvidence that supports ideasQuotes, anecdotes, scientific studies

See Q-I-ST Framework for details.

Why separate them? A study can support multiple ideas. A question can have multiple answers. Keeping them atomic lets you recombine freely.

Practical Test

Can you move this note to a completely different context and still understand it? If yes → atomic. If no → still dependent on original context.


Common Trap

Over-atomizing. You don’t need a separate note for every sentence. The test is: “Is this a distinct idea that might connect elsewhere?” If two things always travel together, keep them together.


North: Where does this comes from?

  • Zettelkasten Method (parent system)
  • [[Cognitive Science)](Chunking (Cognitive Science|Chunking (Cognitive Science)]]) (how working memory handles complexity)

East: What opposes this?

South: Where this leads?

West: What is similar?