Constant Unit Cost vs Inventory Costing Methods

The tension: Variable costs are described as "constant per unit," but FIFO and weighted average exist because purchase prices fluctuate. How do these reconcile?

Two Different Contexts

Context Purpose Method
Cost behavior analysis Planning, budgeting, CVP Uses single planned/average rate
Inventory costing Financial reporting Assigns actual historical costs (FIFO, WA)

They're answering different questions:

Question Domain
"How should costs behave for planning purposes?" Managerial (forward-looking)
"What cost do we assign to units sold vs. remaining?" Financial (backward-looking)

The Reconciliation

For planning: Pick a single rate, treat it as constant within the relevant period. This is a simplification for analysis—like ceteris paribus in economics.

For reporting: Track actual purchase prices over time. FIFO/weighted average determine which historical costs attach to which units.

Standard Costs Bridge the Gap

Many companies use standard costs—predetermined "should cost" rates:

Timeframe Matters

Timeframe What Happens
One quarter Variable cost per unit treated as constant for analysis
One decade Costs shift significantly (e.g., EV batteries down 89%)

The "constant per unit" assumption holds within a planning period, not across years.

Tip

Textbook: "Variable costs are constant per unit"
Reality: "We treat them as constant for planning within a period"


North: Where this comes from

East: What opposes this?

South: Where this leads

West: What's similar?